![reason 7 team air reason 7 team air](https://static.toiimg.com/thumb/width-1600,height-900,imgsize-168016,msid-87065566/87065566.jpg)
![reason 7 team air reason 7 team air](http://blog.dubspot.com/files/2013/03/Reason_MIDI_Out.jpg)
![reason 7 team air reason 7 team air](https://www.calebkenna.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/NYTimesKillingtonSnow-scaled.jpg)
The facilities on Diego Garcia were used to track the Soviet navy throughout the old Cold War. It should also be taken into account that Diego Garcia, a major US military base in the Indian Ocean, is actually situated on British-owned land, the British Indian Ocean Territory, from where the native population of nearly a thousand people was forcibly relocated to Mauritius and the Seychelles when the US first leased the island and built its military installations there in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Britain’s departure from the European Union, or “Brexit”, has made it possible for London to collaborate more closely with the US on the international stage - and that may actually be one of the main reasons why it took that step. Photo: TwitterĪUKUS is significant because it includes Britain. It will find no support and is doomed to fail.”ĭefending China’s territorial claims in the South China Sea, Zhao said: “China is a builder of world peace, contributor of global development and upholder of world order.” But that may not be what the other countries which are involved in the dispute -Vietnam, the Philippines, Taiwan, Malaysia, Brunei and even Indonesia if the Natuna Islands in the southernmost part of it is included - see it.Ĭhinese PLA Navy soldiers on a naval vessel in a file photo. Seeking exclusive closed cliques against a third country runs against the trend of the times and aspiration of countries in the region. A day before the White House summit, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian told the media in Beijing: “China always believes that any regional cooperation mechanism should not target a third party or harm its interests. The BBC reported that Yoshida also “raised concerns during the talks about Beijing’s assertiveness at sea, its trampling of Hong Kong’s special status and Chinese action towards Taiwan.” So what few wanted to say openly was, after all, spelled out by the Japanese. Japan’s foreign press secretary Tomiyuki Yoshida even told reporters at the Quad summit that, “Prime Minister Suga welcomed the initiative of the establishment of the security partnership forged by the three countries … which is taking an important role for the peace and stability of the Indo-Pacific region.” Quad members, it said, stand for “the rule of law, freedom of navigation and overflight, peaceful resolution of disputes, democratic values, climate change, and territorial integrity of states.” Although neither the former nor the latter pact specifically and officially identifies China as the adversary, it is obvious Beijing is the target.Ī joint statement issued after the meeting was also a bit more explicit on security matters. In the wake of the formation of a new strategic alliance comprising the United States, Britain and Australia, President Joseph Biden hosted the first in-person meeting at the White House with three prime ministers: Australia’s Scott Morrison, Japan’s Yoshihide Suga and India’s Narendra Modi.īiden said at the White House meeting with the Quad, or Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, that it was “completely separate” from AUKUS, or the Australia-United Kingdom-United States pact.Īccording to official statements, discussions at the Quad summit at the White House were also said to be mainly about vaccine exports to fight the Covid-19 pandemic, efforts to bolster supply chains for semiconductors, and boost “maritime domain awareness”, whatever that would mean.īut any independent strategic observer would be remiss in claiming that AUKUS and the Quad are not intertwined.